Tariff Tangles

0

March 23, 2026- Once, about a year ago, a friend made the statement that the tariffs being instituted by the U. S. government would be more of a headache for foreign governments than for the average American citizen. I countered that we would all be paying more for imported goods, as no business absorbs added costs, without passing them along to their customers.

Fast forward to this month. Businesses, large and small, are indeed facing the effects of the whipsawing, now-you-see-it, now -you- don’t tariffs. The charges seem to be put in place on whim and are removed just as fast. I have no MBA, but I do know that businesses need to project their activities1-5 years in advance, and certainly concrete plans have to be 6 months to a year ahead. No business can operate like a game of whack-a-mole.

I have spoken, in recent days, with several people in medium-sized and large businesses. Some have only recently returned to work, after leaves of absence, of one kind or another. They have uniformly returned to a mess. Those working in their absence, essentially sat around drinking coffee or playing video games. Backlogs of 1-5 months have accrued, and in some cases, the staffers who were to cover the absent workers, up and left, without getting much accomplished. When pressed, the “deadbeats” said they were just overwhelmed by the back and forth of the US Departments of Commerce and Treasury,, Now, the returned workers are having to exercise the patience of Job, carefully explaining to angry vendors and customers that their services and invoices will be honoured. It will take several weeks or even months.

There is a reason why countries, in our increasingly interconnected world, are reluctant to charge tariffs: They invariably hit the consumer, or taxpayer, the hardest.

Ad Hoc Authority

2

May 26, 2020-

I began reading the National Geographic, for the month of June, whilst doing my laundry, this afternoon. One of the opinion pieces, about the effect of satire and humour, in getting people to understand science, contained the curious statement that “most scientists” agree the GMO-foods are safe to eat-and that Jimmy Kimmel says they’re safe to eat, as well.

I have never heard Mr. Kimmel speak, about anything. When people talk about dietary or nutritional matters, their main frames of reference are: Their dietary needs and preferences; their investments (GMO foods are lucrative) and their aversion to what they see as lapses in efficiency (Small farms and organic methods are often cited as being “inefficient.”)

I also have a problem with “most…….”. It reminds me of the phrase, “They’re all doing it”. Not being a lemming, or a sheep, I have to weigh trends in my mind, before followong along. Nebulous citations, or quoting lay people, who may or may not be authoritative, or articulate, are not altogether convincing.

Many of the problems into which we have fallen, today, are the results of having followed the words of the loudest voice in the room. Ad hoc authority figures have risen up, at various levels of national life-and in other countries, as well. They set policy by feeling their way. I have to caution my readers, to revert back to conducting scrutiny, to the best of your ability, and not taking anything at face value.

Things that may, or may not, be safe, are not ascertained by saying “The scientists say it’s so!” What scientists? Working for whom? Where are their studies, and the peer reviews, published?